I wrote recently that the US government should eliminate oil company subsidies
as suggested by Pres. Obama, but not for the same expressed reasons.
I have received
a comment from one of my associates as follows:
"I almost
agree.
We need an energy plan that:
1.
guarantees and puts us in an immediate position of complete energy
independence, and does not continue to send all of our money to our enemies.
2.
provides a long-term solution to continue that independence (with
alternative energy sources) for the long-term foreseeable future, at least
50-100 years ahead (sufficient lead-time for new energy technology to
develop)
3.
is directed and controlled by big-picture and multi-source interests and
wisdom (a republic); rather than by a small, closed, small thinking,
self-absorbed aristocracy (presidential dictatorship); or by a selfish, short
and small-thinking big group (pure democracy, like the one that voted Obama into
power)".
I replied as
follows:
" We will accomplish your objectives by removing subsidies
and restrictions from oil companies, which will force them to maintain profits
and high stock values by increased production.
There is a potential end
to the supply of oil and gas, but that is unknown and it is many years down the
road. We should not be looking at it as an emergency that needs immediate
action. The last phases of oil and gas availability will eventually be obvious,
with an associated increase in prices. This will occur over several years, which
will be ample time for increased development of the most economically favorable
renewable energy sources.
Oil and gas companies are in the energy
business. When they see that supplies of gas and oil are terminable, they will
switch to supplying other forms of energy. Some have already started this, but
unfortunately have been artificially encouraged to do so by government taxpayer
grants. Government should not be meddling in this area. Free-market needs will
take care of product availability, pricing and competition. The only function
that government should have is to restrict the formation of monopolies, which
would work to the disadvantage of the American public. We have antitrust laws to
do this, and the Justice Department has a requirement to follow this and
prosecute where necessary".
No comments:
Post a Comment